The Definitive Guide to immigration law case management system
The Definitive Guide to immigration law case management system
Blog Article
“There is not any ocular evidence to show that Muhammad Abbas was murdered by any of your present petitioners. Mere fact that Noor Muhammad and Muhammad Din observed firstly the deceased and after a ways they saw the petitioners going towards the same direction, didn't necessarily mean that the petitioners were chasing the deceased or were accompanying him. These types of evidence cannot be treated as evidence of very last observed.
Its enforcement with the provision of capital punishment or life imprisonment underscores the value of human life plus the importance of maintaining law and order in society.
This Court may interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer inside of a way inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the mode of inquiry or where the summary or finding reached via the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If your conclusion or finding is including no reasonable person would have ever achieved, the Court may well interfere with the summary or the finding and mold the relief to make it ideal on the facts of each and every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority would be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-recognize the evidence or maybe the nature of punishment. On the aforesaid proposition, we've been fortified through the decision on the Supreme Court within the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 252 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Section 302 of the Pakistan Penal Code addresses the grave offense of intentional murder and prescribes severe punishments to work as a deterrent and copyright the value of human life. The application in the death penalty or life imprisonment depends over the specifics of every case, together with any extenuating circumstances or mitigating factors.
record of your department there is no record readily available whatsoever regarding promotion in the petitioner(Promotion)
Reasonable grounds are offered within the record to connect the petitioner with the commission commercial law text cases and materials from the alleged offence. However punishment on the alleged offence does not drop from the prohibitory clause of Section 497, Cr.P.C. still figured out Deputy Prosecutor General apprises that another case of similar nature arising outside of FIR No. 1250/2024 dated ten.05.2024 registered under Section 489-F, PPC at Police Station Haji Pura, District Sialkot is within the credit from the petitioner as accused, therefore, case of the petitioner falls in the exception where bail cannot be granted even inside the cases not falling within the ambit of prohibition contained in Section 497, Cr.P.C. In this regard, steering has been sought from the case of “Muhammad Imran versus The State and others” (PLD 2021 Supreme Court 903); relevant portion on the same is hereby reproduced:
Petitioner getting been declared an absconder in this case for over just one in addition to a fifty percent year generates the apprehension that the petitioner may perhaps avoid standing trial and therefore delay the prosecution on the case. The material on record makes the case with the petitioner falls under two exceptions to your rule of grant of bail as mentioned over.
Extra username and password are necessary for this resource. See Username and password webpage for details
Case regulation, also used interchangeably with common legislation, is a regulation that is based on precedents, that would be the judicial decisions from previous cases, instead than regulation based on constitutions, statutes, or regulations. Case legislation uses the detailed facts of the legal case that have been resolved by courts or similar tribunals.
This public interest litigation came before the Supreme Court of Pakistan when petitioners challenged the construction of a close-by electricity grid station as a consequence of potential health risks and hazards.
In a few jurisdictions, case regulation could be applied to ongoing adjudication; for example, criminal proceedings or family legislation.
Regardless of its popularity, very few may possibly know about its intricacies. This article is really an attempt to highlight the flaws of this section and also the really minimal threshold that governs it.
This landmark case expanded the fundamental rights to life and dignity by interpreting these rights to encompass the right to some healthy environment. This decision is particularly significant as there are no specific provisions from the Pakistani Constitution regarding environmental protection. In relation to environmental law in Pakistan, it truly is important that the case set up the application of your precautionary principle where there is really a danger to environmental rights, and emphasized the positive obligations of your State in protecting the right to a clean and healthy environment.
The residents argued that the high-voltage grid station would pose a health risk and likely hazard to local residents. Eventually, the court determined the scientific evidence inconclusive, whilst observing the general trend supports that electromagnetic fields have negative effects on human health. The Court accepted the petitioner’s argument that it should undertake the precautionary principle set out in the 1992 Rio Declaration around the Environment and Enhancement, the first international instrument that linked environment protection with human rights, whereby The shortage of full scientific certainty should not be used as being a reason to prevent environmental degradation.